What You Need to Know About Aboriginal Land Claims in Canada

If you own property in Canada or are considering purchasing real estate, you need to understand how Aboriginal title claims could affect your property rights. From British Columbia to New Brunswick, Quebec to Manitoba, Indigenous communities are asserting title to millions of acres, including lands with private homeowners, businesses, and major infrastructure.

This comprehensive guide explains the landmark Cowichan Tribes decision in BC, examines similar cases unfolding across Canada, and provides practical guidance for property owners navigating this evolving legal landscape.

The Cowichan Decision: What Happened?

On August 7, 2025, the BC Supreme Court released a precedent-setting decision in Cowichan Tribes v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 BCSC 1490. After the longest trial in Canadian history, 513 days spanning over 11 years, Justice Barbara Young ruled that the Cowichan Tribes hold Aboriginal title to approximately 325 hectares (800 acres) of land in Richmond, BC.

This wasn't just any land. The claim area includes:

• Federal port and energy facilities
• Major industrial properties (Amazon, Canadian Tire, Wayfair, UPS warehouses)
• The Country Meadows Golf Course
• Agricultural and farmland
• Approximately 125-150 private residential properties
• Municipal infrastructure including roads and dikes

The Unprecedented Ruling

What makes this decision groundbreaking is that it's the first time a Canadian court has declared Aboriginal title over land that includes private fee simple properties. The judge went further, declaring that Crown grants of fee simple title to federal lands and City of Richmond lands were "defective and invalid" because they unjustifiably infringed on Cowichan Aboriginal title.

For government-owned land, the judge suspended her decision for 18 months to allow for "an orderly transition" and give parties time to negotiate land transfers.

For private property owners, the situation is more complex: the judge ruled that their fee simple titles "are valid until such a time as a court may determine otherwise or until the conflicting interests are resolved through negotiation." In other words, Aboriginal title and fee simple title now coexist on the same land, with Aboriginal title recognized as the "prior and senior right."

Section 8.1 of the Interpretation Act: The Legal Foundation

The Cowichan decision relied heavily on Section 8.1 of BC's Interpretation Act, enacted by the NDP government in November 2021. This provision requires that:

1. Every provincial law must be interpreted as upholding—not derogating from—Aboriginal and treaty rights under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982
2. Every Act and regulation must be interpreted as consistent with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)

In her decision, Justice Young specifically cited Section 8.1 as support for her finding that BC's Land Title Act—which normally provides "indefeasible" (absolute and secure) title to registered owners—cannot override Aboriginal title.

This interpretation marked a significant shift. The Land Title Act was previously understood to provide certainty and finality to property ownership in BC. The Cowichan decision suggests that this certainty may be subject to Aboriginal title claims on unceded lands.

Real-World Impact: What's Happening in Richmond

The consequences of the Cowichan decision are already being felt:

Property Marketability Issues

The City of Richmond sent letters to approximately 150 property owners within the claim area in October 2025, warning that the court decision could compromise the validity of their ownership. Properties in the affected area are estimated to be worth over $2 billion.

Financing Challenges

Richmond City Councillor Alexa Loo reported that a local company was refused financing for a $100 million project due to uncertainty about their site. Lenders are increasingly hesitant to provide mortgages on properties where title validity is in question.

Property Tax Appeals

A group of affected homeowners has started appealing their property taxes, arguing their homes are no longer worth their assessed values given the title uncertainty.

Packed Town Halls with Concerned Homeowners

Public meetings in Richmond have been standing-room-only, with hundreds of frustrated residents demanding answers about their property rights and seeking clarity on what happens next.

Aboriginal Title Claims Across Canada

The Cowichan case is part of a much larger national pattern. Aboriginal title claims are active across Canada, affecting millions of acres and potentially impacting property rights from coast to coast.

British Columbia Claims

Shuswap Nation (Kamloops Area)

The Secwepemc (Shuswap) Nation has filed a claim seeking title over the entire city of Kamloops and surrounding area, including:

• All of urban Kamloops
• Sun Peaks ski resort
• Railways and roads
• Multiple privately-owned tenures

Haida Nation (Haida Gwaii)

In a separate August 2025 decision, the BC Supreme Court granted Aboriginal title to the Haida Nation over the terrestrial areas of Haida Gwaii. This was the first court decision granting Aboriginal title on consent of the Crown parties. The title had already been recognized by statute through the Haida Nation Recognition Amendment Act, 2024.

Under the negotiated agreement, privately-owned lands remain unchanged and under BC authority, providing a potential model for reconciliation.

shíshálh Nation (Sunshine Coast)

In January 2025, the BC government revealed it had made an agreement with the shíshálh (Sechelt) Nation on the Sunshine Coast for Indigenous management of land and resources. The agreement was negotiated in August 2024 but kept hidden for five months until after the provincial election.

Musqueam and Tsawwassen Claims

Both the Musqueam Indian Band and Tsawwassen First Nation opposed the Cowichan claim, arguing it infringes on their own title and fishing rights in the same area. Musqueam has appealed the Cowichan decision and stated they will "vigorously defend" their rights, which they say are supported by Supreme Court of Canada precedents.

New Brunswick: Wolastoqey Nations Claim

Perhaps the most extensive Aboriginal title claim in Canada is unfolding in New Brunswick, where six Wolastoqey Nations are claiming Aboriginal title to more than 50% of the province encompassing 283,204 separate parcels of land.

The Claim:

• Covers over half of New Brunswick
• Includes lands owned by the Crown, private homeowners, and major industrial forestry companies (J.D. Irving, H.J. Crabbe & Sons, Acadian Timber)
• The Wolastoqey were "deliberately and strategically excluded" from the numbered treaties
• Their title has never been extinguished through surrender or legislation

Legal Precedent (November 2024):

In a landmark November 2024 decision (Wolastoqey Nations v. New Brunswick, 2024 NBKB 203), the New Brunswick Court of King's Bench ruled that:

• Aboriginal title can be declared over privately-owned lands
• Private landowners are not proper parties to Aboriginal title claims—only the Crown has constitutional obligations
• The Crown must represent private landowners' interests in negotiations
• Aboriginal title and fee simple can coexist on the same land

The court struck the industrial defendants from the lawsuit but allowed the Wolastoqey claim to proceed against the Crown. Importantly, the land held by these private companies remains part of the claim area and could be subject to a declaration of Aboriginal title.

Current Status:

The industrial defendants appealed the decision. Their appeal was heard in October 2025, with judgment currently under reserve. The Wolastoqey have stated they are not seeking to displace private homeowners.

Following the court decision, New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt's government directed lawyers to suspend litigation to allow for negotiated settlement discussions.

Also in New Brunswick:

Eight Mi'kmaq communities have filed a separate title claim against the federal Crown, the Province of New Brunswick, New Brunswick Power Corporation, and the Regional Development Corporation. There are also overlapping claims between the Wolastoqey and Peskotomuhkati Nations.

Quebec: Kitigan Zibi Anishinābeg Claim

In October 2025, the Kitigan Zibi Anishinābeg First Nation filed an Aboriginal title claim in Quebec Superior Court seeking title to over 8,000 square kilometres in western Quebec, along with $5 billion in damages.

Areas Covered:

• Gatineau Park (popular recreational area)
• Baskatong Reservoir
• Papineau-Labelle wildlife reserve
• Islands in the Ottawa River (Morris and Kettle Islands)
• Parts of the city of Gatineau
• Areas flooded by the Mercier hydroelectric dam (1927)

Key Arguments:

• The Algonquin Anishinaabe Nation (ancestors of Kitigan Zibi) never relinquished these lands
• Billions of dollars in resources have been extracted without compensation
• Transfer of Gatineau Park to the National Capital Commission violated treaty obligations
• Construction of hydroelectric dams proceeded without consent

Defendants:

• Federal and Quebec governments
• Hydro-Québec
• National Capital Commission

Chief Jean-Guy Whiteduck stated the intention is not to displace private landowners—the lawsuit only covers lands owned or managed by governments. The case was inspired by the Cowichan decision in BC.

Separate Ontario Claim:

Kitigan Zibi also filed a title claim in 2016 over lands in Ontario, including Parliament Hill, LeBreton Flats, and islands in the Ottawa River. That case is expected to be heard by 2028.

Manitoba: Dakota Nations Claims

The Dakota Nations in Manitoba have filed multiple Aboriginal title claims seeking recognition and compensation for lands they say were never ceded.

Williston Basin Oil and Gas Claim (November 2025)

Canupawakpa Dakota First Nation and Dakota Tipi First Nation filed a claim seeking title and subsurface rights to the entire Williston Basin in southwestern Manitoba.

Economic Impact:

• Annual value of oil and gas production exceeds $1.3 billion
• In 2024, Manitoba generated $14.2 million in royalties and $9.6 million in production taxes
• The Nations seek the right to economically participate in mineral extraction

Key Points:

• Dakota were "deliberately and strategically excluded from the numbered treaties"
• The land is unceded ancestral territory
• They are not seeking transfer of private rights, but want equitable damages from Canada

Manitoba Hydro Lands Claim (October 2025)

The same two Dakota Nations sued Manitoba Hydro, the province, and the federal government, alleging they have been "unjustly enriched" through hydro operations on ancestral lands.

Allegations:

• Manitoba Hydro earned $3.9 billion in profits from power exports (2010-2019) without consulting the Dakota
• The Crown allowed economic activity without obtaining informed consent
• Dakota communities were excluded and denied economic sustainability

Other Dakota Claims:

Dakota Tipi First Nation has also filed claims over:

• The Forks in Winnipeg
• Southport Aerospace Centre near Portage la Prairie
• Various other Manitoba Hydro operations

Ontario Claims

Algonquins of Ontario Land Claim

One of the largest and most complex land claims in Ontario involves the Algonquins of Ontario, covering approximately 36,000 square kilometres (8.9 million acres) in eastern Ontario.

Areas Included:

• Most of eastern Ontario
• Parliament Hill
• Algonquin Park
• CFB Petawawa
• City of Ottawa
• Populated by approximately 1.2 million people

Current Status:Ontario, Canada, and the Algonquins of Ontario are in the final stage of treaty negotiations. Unlike many other claims, no private property will be taken away under this negotiation. Any lands transferred to the Algonquins will be held in fee simple (privately owned) and subject to the same land use planning and development approvals as other private lands.

The parties have been negotiating since the 1990s and anticipate reaching a Final Agreement in the coming years.

Mississaugas of the Credit - Rouge River Valley Tract

In March 2025, the Mississaugas of the Credit First Nation, Ontario, and Canada announced a proposed settlement for the Rouge River Valley Tract Claim—a dispute dating back to the late 18th century.

The Claim:

• Asserts Aboriginal rights and title to 128,697 acres on the north shore of Lake Ontario
• Seeks fair financial compensation and a renewed Treaty relationship
• Part of a 230-year-old Treaty dispute

Negotiations began in 2022, with Ontario joining in fall 2024. The proposed financial settlement is currently in community engagement.

Chippewas of Saugeen - Sauble Beach

In a 2024 Ontario Court of Appeal decision (Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation v. South Bruce Peninsula), the court ruled that the constitutional rights of the Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation take precedence over the fee simple property rights of private landowners.

The Dispute:

• Concerns a two-square-kilometre stretch of Sauble Beach
• The land was excluded from the Saugeen Reserve when surveyed
• Private landowners argued the "bona fide purchaser" defence (purchased in good faith)
• Court ruled that treaty-protected reserve interests don't automatically give way to private property interests

This case demonstrates that even good-faith purchasers may not have absolute protection against Aboriginal title claims.

What This Means for Property Owners and Buyers Across Canada

If You Own Property in Canada

1. Check for Active Claims: Determine whether your property falls within any known Aboriginal title claim areas across the country
2. Monitor Appeals: The Cowichan and Wolastoqey appeals will set important national precedents
3. Document Everything: Keep all property records, title insurance documents, and correspondence organized
4. Consider Title Insurance: While standard title insurance may not cover Aboriginal title claims, some policies are being revised to address these issues
5. Stay Informed: Follow developments in key cases across all provinces
6. Understand Regional Variations: Aboriginal title issues vary by province—BC has unique challenges due to the lack of treaties in most of the province

If You're Buying Property in Canada

1. Due Diligence is Critical: Work with experienced real estate lawyers who understand Aboriginal title issues in your region
2. Ask Direct Questions: Inquire whether the property falls within any known claim areas
3. Review Title Insurance Carefully: Understand what is and isn't covered regarding Aboriginal title claims
4. Consider Location: Properties in areas with active negotiations may face more uncertainty
5. Research Provincial Context: Understanding whether your property is in treaty or non-treaty territory matters
6. Don't Panic, But Be Informed: Remember that most First Nations have stated they don't intend to displace private homeowners

‍

Looking Ahead: What to Expect Nationally

Short Term (Next 6-12 Months)

• Appeals court decisions on the Cowichan case (BC)
• Judgment on the Wolastoqey industrial defendants appeal (New Brunswick)
• Progress on Kitigan Zibi claims in Quebec and Ontario
• Potential legislative amendments to DRIPA in BC or similar legislation in other provinces
• Continued negotiations between governments and First Nations across Canada
• More clarity on title insurance coverage nationally

Medium Term (1-3 Years)

• Possible Supreme Court of Canada reviews of Cowichan or Wolastoqey
• Development of reconciliation frameworks for conflicting interests across provinces
• Emergence of negotiated settlement models (e.g., Haida agreement in BC, Algonquins of Ontario)
• Potential changes to land title legislation in multiple provinces
• Resolution of Dakota Nations claims in Manitoba
• Progress on Quebec claims including Kitigan Zibi

Long Term (3-5 Years)

• Legal certainty on the relationship between Aboriginal title and fee simple nationally
• Established processes for reconciling competing interests
• Clear guidelines for property transactions in claim areas
• Comprehensive resolution frameworks that balance Indigenous rights with property rights
• Potential constitutional protection for both Aboriginal title and private property
• Modern treaties and agreements across unceded territories

The Bigger Picture: Reconciliation, Property Rights, and Canada's Unceded Territories

The wave of Aboriginal title claims across Canada sits at the intersection of two important Canadian values: reconciliation with Indigenous peoples and protection of private property rights.

Why Now? The Historical Context

For much of Canada's history, Indigenous land rights were ignored, suppressed, or actively undermined by government policy. Several factors have converged to create the current wave of title claims:

1. Constitutional Protection (1982): Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 recognizes and affirms Aboriginal and treaty rights, providing constitutional protection that didn't exist before.

2. Legal Precedents: Landmark Supreme Court decisions like Delgamuukw v. British Columbia (1997) and Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia (2014) established that Aboriginal title continues to exist on unceded lands and defines the legal tests for proving it.

3. Lack of Treaties: Large portions of Canada—including most of BC, parts of Quebec, and other regions—are unceded territories where no treaties were ever signed. In other areas like New Brunswick, treaties were "Peace and Friendship" treaties that didn't include land cession.

4. Legislative Support: Recent legislation like BC's Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act (2019) and amendments to provincial Interpretation Acts have created frameworks that support Indigenous rights claims.

5. Growing Indigenous Legal Capacity: First Nations now have the resources, legal expertise, and organizational capacity to pursue complex litigation that was previously beyond reach.

The Two Sides of the Equation

On one hand, the decisions acknowledge historical injustices:

• Indigenous communities were displaced from traditional territories without treaty or compensation
• Resources worth billions have been extracted from traditional lands without benefit to Indigenous peoples
• Aboriginal title is constitutionally protected under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982
• The Crown has fiduciary duties to Indigenous peoples that were historically ignored

On the other hand, millions of Canadians have property interests to protect:

• Properties were purchased in good faith, relying on government-issued titles
• The economic implications of widespread title uncertainty could be severe
• Private property rights, while not constitutionally protected, are fundamental to economic activity
• Current owners are "innocent purchasers" who bear no responsibility for historical wrongs

Why Private Property Rights Aren't Constitutionally Protected

Unlike Aboriginal rights, private property rights are not enshrined in Canada's Constitution. This creates an asymmetry when Aboriginal title and private ownership conflict—courts must uphold constitutional rights over non-constitutional interests.

This is why legal scholars like Kent McNeil, John Borrows, and Peter Hogg argue that Aboriginal title is effectively the only constitutionally protected property right in Canada.

Key Takeaways for Property Owners Across Canada

1. Don't Panic: Most First Nations pursuing title claims have stated they're not seeking to displace homeowners. They typically seek recognition, consultation rights, and economic participation rather than eviction of private owners.
2. Stay Informed: Follow the appeals process in key cases (Cowichan in BC, Wolastoqey in New Brunswick) as they will set important national precedents.
3. Work with Professionals: Engage experienced real estate lawyers familiar with Aboriginal title issues in your province, especially for transactions in areas with known claims.
4. Understand Your Region: The Aboriginal title landscape varies significantly by province. BC and Quebec face unique challenges due to unceded territories, while Ontario has more negotiated frameworks, and New Brunswick's recent court decisions have created new precedents.
5. Understand Your Rights: You have legal protections as a fee simple owner, even as the legal framework evolves. Courts have consistently indicated that solutions should be found through negotiation.
6. Document Everything: Keep detailed records of all property-related documents and communications, including title insurance policies.
7. Consider the Long View: Legal clarity will emerge through the appeals process and negotiations, though it may take several years.
8. This is a National Issue: Aboriginal title claims are not isolated to one province—they reflect Canada-wide constitutional obligations and historical treaties (or lack thereof).

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Are Aboriginal title claims only an issue in British Columbia?

A: No. Aboriginal title claims are active across Canada, including:

• New Brunswick (over 50% of the province claimed by Wolastoqey Nations)
• Quebec (Kitigan Zibi claim covering Gatineau and surrounding areas)
• Manitoba (Dakota Nations claims over oil/gas lands and hydro operations)
• Ontario (multiple claims including Algonquins of Ontario, ongoing since the 1990s)

Any province or territory with unceded land or unfulfilled treaty obligations could face Aboriginal title claims.

Q: What's the difference between treaty and non-treaty territories?

A: In treaty territories, Indigenous groups signed agreements with the Crown (though many argue these were not honored). In non-treaty territories like most of BC, much of Quebec, and parts of other provinces, no treaties were ever signed, meaning Aboriginal title was never legally extinguished.

Q: How is the Wolastoqey claim in New Brunswick different from Cowichan?

A: The Wolastoqey claim covers over 50% of New Brunswick (283,204 parcels). The November 2024 court decision established that Aboriginal title can be declared over private lands, but private landowners aren't proper parties to the litigation—only the Crown is. This could set a national precedent for how title claims proceed.

Q: What happened with the Dakota Nations in Manitoba?

A: Dakota Nations have filed multiple claims, including for the Williston Basin (oil and gas worth $1.3 billion annually) and Manitoba Hydro lands. Notably, they are NOT seeking transfer of private rights but want economic participation and compensation from governments.

Q: Is my property in Ontario affected?

A: It depends on location. The Algonquins of Ontario claim covers much of eastern Ontario, but negotiations have progressed with protections for private property. However, the Sauble Beach decision showed that treaty rights can override private ownership in Ontario.

Q: Will I lose my home if it's in an Aboriginal title claim area?

A: The Cowichan Tribes and other First Nations pursuing title claims have generally stated they're not seeking to displace private homeowners. Any changes to private property would require either court proceedings or negotiated agreements.

Q: Can I still sell my property if it's in a claim area?

A: Yes, but you may face challenges with marketability and financing. Full disclosure to potential buyers is essential.

Q: Does my title insurance cover Aboriginal title claims?

A: Most standard title insurance policies were written before these issues emerged. Review your policy carefully and discuss coverage with your insurer.

Q: Should I wait to buy property in BC until this is resolved?

A: That's a personal decision based on your circumstances, risk tolerance, and timeline. Work with experienced professionals who can help you understand the specific risks for any property you're considering.

Q: How long will it take to get legal clarity?

A: The appeals process could take 3-5 years or longer if the case reaches the Supreme Court of Canada.

‍

‍